| Search results - "misconduct" |
Later Local Observations Should Respect Earlier Global DiscoveriesA Letter to Science asking to pay respect for earlier global discoveries was rejected by Science. Why would Science continues to glorify some local observations that only lately re-discover what already discovered before and meanwhile ignored the original pioneering discoveries?
Abstract
|
|
Logical Biology Enters the Year of a Firing Dog
After serving its role as a rooster calling for the break of dark night curtain and the coming of truthful and justified sunshine, Logical Biology will soon enter its year of Dog. Like a scientific watch dog, it will perform a more active role in promoting good science fighting against bad science with its unique logical sense.
Abstract
|
|
Nilsson and Science Owe Public More Answers than a Simple RetractionScience recently published a retraction which blamed only a junior author (who refused to sign the untruthful retraction statement) for all the data-manipulation “misconduct”. However, some inside story disclosed so far suggests that the senior corresponding author Nilsson and even Science owe public more answers because they might have committed some high-level misconduct.
Abstract
|
|
A Pioneer Award Has Been Used for Stealing Credit from a True PioneerLiu’s prediction of non-random DNA strand segregation and precise drawings of the retaining of old template DNA strand by the mother cell and receiving of young template DNA strand by the daughter cell has been published for years. Thomas A. Rando of Stanford University knew aboutthe existence of such publications but omitted them entirely in both his research publication and review. His downright distortion of history and his outright credit robbery is a more serious offense than any other experimental data fabrication and falsification misconduct because it is an insult to science and a crime to humanity.
Abstract
|
|
A Global Center for Communicating Researches on Scientific Ethics and Fighting against Scientific MisconductsA new platform for communicating researches on scientific ethics and exposing misconducts in scientific researches and publishing is now set in place. Scientific Ethics (SE) will become the global center for exchanging research results and ideas on how to enhance ethical scientific behaviors and for exposing and fighting against all kinds of scientific misconducts and crimes.
Abstract
|
|
| 125 files on 25 page(s) |
 |
1 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
