| Search results - "Repetition," |
Idea Repetition and Credit Robbery in iPS Research and Publishing
A publication in Cell echoed most of Liu’s already published opinions on iPS cells but cited none of his prior publications. Is this practice ethical?
Abstract
|
|
Repeated applications do not validate 'induction' by iPS techniqueIgnoring criticisms of lacking appropriate controls and direct demonstration iPS cell researchers have tried to advance their unproven discovery of reprogramming non-stem cells into stem cells by just climbing up the evolutionary ladder.
Abstract
|
|
Towards a Balanced View on iPS CellsA mini-review aimed at presenting a balanced view on iPS cells was first rejected by Cell Research and then by Nature. Why are these “mainstream” journals so reluctant to publish alternative perspectives or truthful views on the much hyped iPS cells?
Abstract
|
|
Shi V. Liu's Collection of Rejections by Mainstream Journals: 2008-2009
A list of Shi V. Liu’s manuscripts submitted to but either rejected or totally neglected by some mainstream top journals is published here. From this list, the dark side of some corrupted journals can be seen more clearly.
Abstract
|
|
|
|
