| Search results - "Rejection," |
The Impact Factor Scam in Scientific PublishingImpact factor (IF) has become a very popular commodity in scientific publishing. However, how much value it really has when its calculation is based on many misleading or even completely invalid citations. Is the strong promotion for IF a commercial scam?
Abstract
|
|
Science and Art: Even More Akin than Hitherto PresumedA fallacious technical comment and several misconceptions were contained in a recent review published in the May 2007 issue of Scientific American. Although an effort to point out these mistakes in a proposed Letter to the Editor was undertaken on June 11, 2007, Scientific American rejected this suggested contribution on the grounds of being “too late” to be under consideration (!).
Abstract
|
|
Towards a Better Understanding of Intrinsic Cell AgeingA solid criticism to a Nature publication was not formally responded by its authors and even rejected by Nature for publication.
Abstract
|
|
iPS Mice: Passing Acid Test Or Breaking Basic Ethics?A letter questioning the scientific and ethic value of iPS mice was rejected by Science and is published here as an open letter.
Abstract
|
|
From Predicting the Insulin-Retinoblastoma Protein Complex to Particle Biology and Beyond
This is a revelation of the rejections by mainstream scientific journals of an important discovery that is beginning to make a lot of sense.
Abstract
|
|
|
|
