| Search results - "Editorial" |
Later Local Observations Should Respect Earlier Global DiscoveriesA Letter to Science asking to pay respect for earlier global discoveries was rejected by Science. Why would Science continues to glorify some local observations that only lately re-discover what already discovered before and meanwhile ignored the original pioneering discoveries?
Abstract
|
|
From Discovery to Development:The Special Case Requiring Additional CatalystsThis Editorial emphasizes the requirement for additional catalysts if discoveries made by exceptional human individuals- who are thus acting as primary catalysts in the generation of new knowledge- are to be developed into products. These additional catalytic factors are indispensable especially when it comes to developing a technical device on the basis of a theory in physics or a drug on the basis of a concept in biology. History shows that many powerful patrons who shared the vision with the discoverer have played such a catalytic role in facilitating the further development of the initial discoveries mainly through their considerable financial support.
Abstract
|
|
Sitting on Top of "Top" JournalsA new scientific journal dedicated to watch for and criticize on flawed publications in other scientific journals especially the so-called “top” journals is launched. Top Watch will save no face for anyone promoting falsehood in science and save no space for debating controversies.
Abstract
|
|
Honesty in Scientific Debate and Ethics for Scientific ResearchIn order to “win” a debate in front of editors some “scientists” would rather resort to cheating and misrepresentation. A recent debate on authorship and knowledge creation shows a typical case of such dishonesty and nonobjectivity in scientific debate.
Abstract
|
|
Hiding Truth Is More Harmful Than Faking DiscoveryA Correspondence to Nature expressing a fact-based view was rejected by Nature. Why would Nature keep suppressing a revelation of a truth?
Abstract
|
|
|
|
