| Search results - "Death," |
New Bacterial Life Model Carried by an Electronic Eastern WindA research article published in Science in China [42(6): 644-654, 1999 (English); 29(6): 571-579, 1999 (Chinese)] reports a successful long-term real-time continuous observation on bacteria living in liquid suspension. The observations led to a proposal of new bacterial life model. This new model claims that two bacteria formed from one bacterium have a parent-child relationship and bacterial age should be defined by the chronological time it experiences and not by its reproduction stage.
Abstract
|
|
Immortal Strand Does Not Exist but Nonrandom Strand Segregation Should Be UniversalCell recently published two articles on the immortal strand hypothesis for DNA and its implications for interpreting some newly observed experimental phenomena. However, not only the immortal DNA strand hypothesis was a wrong hypothesis but also many interpretations on the nonrandom strand segregation are still incorrect. Amazingly, a submission identifying these mistakes was rejected for publication by Cell.
Abstract
|
|
The Stanford Connection: An Open Letter to Thomas Rando and His Stanford ProtectorsThomas Rando has repeatedly and intentionally ignored existing discoveries just to grab credit for himself. His unethical behaviors were publicly criticized but have been so far strongly protected by his employer – the Stanford University School of Medicine.
Abstract
|
|
Denouncing Martin Ackermann's Repeated Credit RobberiesKnowing the existence of many prior publications on bacterial aging Martin Ackermann continued in BioTechniques his outright lie that “It was never investigated if two cells emerging from cell division are indeed both young”.
Abstract
|
|
Open Letter to CellOver the years Cell has rejected many of my submissions describing truly great discoveries which were later echoed by its own publications but without due credit to true pioneers. Cell has also rejected many of my criticisms on its untruthful “discoveries”. Instead of correcting its mistakes, Cell even completely ignored my submissions and refused to give any response to my inquiries.
Abstract
|
|
|
|
