N2 |
 |
| Sort by |
Up |
Down |
| TITLE |
+ |
- |
| FILE NAME |
+ |
- |
| DATE |
+ |
- |
| POSITION |
+ |
- |
|
|
Solid Observations Fraught with Erroneous Interpretations and Wrong Conclusions
After consistently rejecting a fundamentally new discovery for decades, Nature is now re-inventing a widely-seen wheel but doing it with a totally unscientific and even unethical approach.
Abstract
|
|
Outright Misrepresentation Should Be an Easy Target Amenable to Invalidation
Recent “discovery” of “induced pluripotent stem cells” (iPSCs) is a well-protected misrepresentation. Most likely, iPSCs are incorrectly programmed stem cells or, more directly speaking, man-made cancer stem cells (mm-CSCs). However, despite the existence of many mainstream-rejected but sidestream-published criticisms, a few impact-factor-wise “top” journals are still publishing various hypes on iPSCs. Nature is the most prominent such “top” journal because it has even intentionally suppressed alternative views and is still strongly protecting some outright misrepresentations. However, history will show that the downfall of iPS hyping may drag down not just a few dishonest “scientists” but also some most irresponsible and largely corrupted “top” journals.
Abstract
|
|
Shi V. Liu's Collection of Rejections by Mainstream Journals: 2008-2009
A list of Shi V. Liu’s manuscripts submitted to but either rejected or totally neglected by some mainstream top journals is published here. From this list, the dark side of some corrupted journals can be seen more clearly.
Abstract
|
|
|
|
