Nature
deleted Shi Liu¡¯s comment, again!
On July 28th, 2009 Shi Liu posted
the following comment under the Nature
News
¡°Mice made from induced stem cells¡±(
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/090723/full/460560a.html).
¡¤
Can we calm down a little bit and see if the passage of
some incorrectly programmed stem cells (iPSCs) may be a harmful thing to mice
now and to humans in future? We now know that iPSCs are not
"indistinguishable" from ESCs and many of Yamanaka¡¯s "safe"
iPSCs showed tumor/cancer formation (see details at http://im1.biz/iPS.htm ). Why the researchers
have not systematically looked tumor formation on the IPSCs generated here in
the Yamanaka way? Why the team wouldn't even reveal the details of the
"abnormalities"? Is the higher than 97% death rate a real success or
a great failure even in the reproductive cloning sense?
However, this comment was deleted by Nature before July 29, 2009.
What is wrong with this comment?
Was this comment more offensive than any of the following selected
comments still preserved by Nature?
¡¤
Incredible feat, another reason why Yamanaka could be a
candidate for the Nobel. I suspect some in the popular press will potray this
technology as another doorway to human cloning.
o
23 Jul, 2009
o
Posted by: David Rubin
o
¡¤
@Elizabeth Platt Read the full article yourself.
"Gao's team is now trying to mate its surviving mouse." Any reputable
scientist would call this "rushing to press", before
sufficient verification.
o
24 Jul, 2009
Why would Nature
selectively delete Shi Liu¡¯s comment?
What makes Shi Liu a person so afraid of by Nature?
Why is Nature so scared of so letting public to
know Liu¡¯s views?