Top Watch  3(1):22-25, 2008

OPEN DISPLAT

http://im1.biz

 

© Truthfinding Cyberpress

IPS PUBLICATION

 

The Fast Track for Publishing iPS Research

 

Shi V. Liu

 

Eagle Institute of Molecular Medicine

 Apex, NC 27502 USA

SVL@logibio.com

 

(Received 2008-02-25; accepted 2008-05-01; published 2008-05-30*)

 

HIGHLIGHT

 

The speed of publishing research reports on iPS cells has created some world records that may be hard to beat.  But once the iPS “airplanes” go down people may ask why there was such hurry in release those flawed “airplanes” into the therapeutic cloning “sky”?

 

ABSTRACT

 

Within one and half years, at least 20 research reports have been published in various “top” journals.  Except for a relatively slow start, the speed of publishing iPS research reports was extremely fast.  Some papers were accepted within just two weeks of submission and put online in about three weeks.  Why would “top” journals rush in publishing iPS research paper?  Did they give these papers the much needed scrutiny?  Why all these “top” journals would keep a tight suppression on criticisms on their publications on iPS cells?

 

KEY WORDS

 

Stem cell, ES, iPS, Cloning, Induction, Reprogramming, Regeneration, Hype, Spinning, Fast track, Publish

 

 

Since the publication of the first iPS research paper in 2006 [1], at least 20 research papers on iPS cells have been published so far (Table 1).

 

Although there was a little “hesitance” in publishing the first research report on iPS cells [1], once the barrier was broken, the speed of publishing iPS research has become faster and faster, especially for some selected research groups.

 

For examples, Yamanaka’s second iPS paper submitted to Cell was accepted in 13 days and published in 22 days.  A few other iPS researchers seemed also to have the capability of running the fast tracks in publishing.

 

However, coming with this rush was also some relaxing of scrutiny.  As a matter of fact, these “top” journals even did not care about doing a descent job because some very obvious mistakes happened in the “high quality” journals [2-4].  More amazingly, the fast publication of iPS research reports was made while these journals suppressed the publication of some strong criticisms (http://im1.biz/Cloning.htm).

 

Thus, once the hyping and misrepresentation is realized by the mainstream, it would be a great shame that those “experts” could not detect some obvious flaws in the iPS research.  It would also be a great irony that the “top” journals were at the bottom of publishing truth.

 

 

Table 1. A chronological list of experimental research reports on iPS cells

 

No

Reference

Group

Received

Revised

Accepted

Publish online

Publish in print

Accepted

 

Published **

1

Takahashi 2006 [1]

1

2006-04-24

2006-06-18

2006-06-20

2006-08-10

Cell 126:663, 2006

<2m

~4m

2

Okita et al 2007 [5]

1

2007-02-06

 

2007-05-22

2007-06-06

Nature 448:313, 2007

~3m

~4m

3

Wernig et al 2007 [6]

2

2007-02-27

 

2007-05-22

2007-06-06

Nature 448:318, 2007

<3m

~4m

4

Maherali et al 2007 [7]

3

2007-03-31

2007-05-04

2007-05-14

2007-06-06

Cell Stem Cell 1: 50, 2007

<2m

~2m

5

Blelloch et al 2007 [8]

4

NR

NR

NR

NR

Cell Stem Cell 1: 245, 2007

NA

NA

6

Mann et al [9]

9

NR

NR

NR

NR

Nature Method August 2007 page i

NA

NA

7

Meissner et al [10]

2

2007-05-29

 

2007-08-09

2007-08-27

Nature Biotechnol. 25:1177, 2007

<3m

~3m

8

Qin et al. [11]

7

NR

NR

NR

2007-11-06

Cell Res. 17: 959,2007

NA

NA

9

Yu et al 2007 [12]

5

2007-10-09

 

2007-11-14

2007-11-20

Science 318:1927, 2007

35d

42d

10

Hanna et al 2007 [13]

2

2007-10-23

 

2007-11-26

2007-12-06

Science 318: 1920, 2007

33d

42d

11

Takahashi et al 2007 [14]

1

2007-10-29

2007-11-07

2007-11-12

2007-11-20

Cell 131: 861, 2007

13d

22d

12

Nakagawa et al 2007 [15]

1

2007-11-06

 

2007-11-23

2007-11-30

Nature Biotechnol. 26: 101, 2008

17d

24d

13

Brambrink et al [16]

2

2007-11-15

2007-12-20

2008-01-11

2008-02-06 (P)

Cell Stem Cell 2:151, 2008

<2m

<3m

14

Park et al 2007 [17]

6

2007-11-16

 

2007-12-10

2007-12-23

Nature 451: 141, 2008

24d

37d

15

Masaki et al [18]

8

2007-12-01

2008-01-09

2008-01-12

 

Stem Cell Res. 1:105,2008

33d

 

16

Aoi et al  [19]

1

2008-01-07

 

2008-02-07

2008-02-14

Science

(AOP)

30

37

17

Stadtfeld et al [20]

3

2008-01-20

2008-02-04

2008-02-05

2008-02-14

Cell Stem Cell 2:1,2008

16

25

18

Lowry et al [21]

10

2007-12-05

2007-12-19

?

2008-02-26

PNAS 105:2883,2008

NA

81

19

Liao et al [22]

11

NR

NR

NR

2008-04-15

Cell Res 18:600, 2008

NA

NA

20

Hanna et al [23]

2

2008-02-19

2008-03-19

2008-03-26

2008-04-17

Cell 133:250, 2008

37

56

 

* Group: 1= Yamanaka’s lab; 2=Jaenisch’s lab; 3=Hochedlinger’s lab; 4=Ramalho-Santos’ lab; 5=Thomson’ lab; 6 Daley’s lab, 7 D. Pei’s lab, 8 =Masaki et al; 9 =Mann et al; 10 = Plath’s lab. 11 = G. Pei’s lab.

** Publishing speed based on first publication either online or in print.

NR: Not revealed; NA: not applicable; AOP = Advanced online publication

 

References

 

1.     Takahashi K, Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126:663-676.

2.     Liu SV: Towards a balanced view on iPS Cells. Logical Biology 2008, 8:32-38.

3.     Liu SV: The final blow-up of the induction and reprogramming claim for iPS cells. Logical Biology 2008, In press.

4.     Liu SV: iPS cells: a more critical review. Stem Cells Dev  Published advanced online doi: 101089/scd20080062 2008.

5.     Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S: Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2007, 448:313-317.

6.     Wernig M, Meissner A, Foreman R, Brambrink T, Ku M, Hochedlinger K, Bernstein BE, Jaenisch R: In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 2007, 448:318-324.

7.     Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W, Utikal J, Eminli S, Arnold K, Stadtfeld M, Yachechko R, Tchieu J, Jaenisch R, et al: Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1:55-70.

8.     Blelloch R, Venere M, Yen J, Ramalho-Santo M: Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of drug selection. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1:245-247.

9.     Mann CJ, Newman ENC, Whitney DJ, Latchem NJ, Bramke I, Burke JF: Stem and iPS cell selection: quantitation of surface marker (SSEA1) and intracellular GFP. Nature Method 2007, August:i-ii.

10.   Meissner A, Wernig M, Jaenisch R: Direct reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:1177-1181.

11.   Qin D, Li W, Zhang J, Pei D: Direct generation of ES-like cells from unmodified mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4/Sox2/Myc/Klf4. Cell Res 2007, 17:959-962.

12.   Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, et al: Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 2007, 318:1917-1920.

13.   Hanna J, Wernig M, Markoulaki S, Sun C-W, Meissner A, Cassady JP, Beard C, Brambrink T, Wu L-C, Townes TM, Jaenisch R: Treatment of sickle cell anemia mouse model with iPS cells generated from autologous skin. Science 2007, 318:1920-1923.

14.   Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007, 131:861-872.

15.   Nakagawa M, Yoyanagi M, Tanabe K, Takahashi K, Ichisaka T, Aoi T, Okita K, Mochiduki Y, Takizawa N, Yamanaka S: Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nature Biotechnol 2008, 26:101-106.

16.   Brambrink T, Foreman R, Welstead GG, Lengner CJ, Wernig M, Suh H, Jaenisch R: Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2:151-159.

17.   Park IH, Zhao R, West JA, Yabuuchi A, Huo H, Ince TA, Lerou PH, Lensch MW, Daley GQ: Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature 2007, 451:141-146.

18.   Masaki H, Ishikawa T, Takahashi S, Okumura M, Sakai N, Haga M, Kominami K, Migita H, McDonald F, Shimada F, Sakurada K: Heterogeneity of pluripotent marker gene expression in colonies generated in human iPS cell induction culture. Stem Cell Res 2008, 1:105-115.

19.   Aoi T, Yae K, Nakagawa M, Ichisaka T, Okita K, Takahashi K, Chiba T, Yamanaka S: Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult mouse liver and stomach cells. Science 2007, AOP Februay 14, 2008:DOI 10.1126/science.1154884.

20.   Stadtfeld M, Maherali N, Breault D, Hochedlinger K: Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2:1-11.

21.   Lowry WE, Richter L, Yachechko R, Pyle AD, Tchieu J, Sridharan R, Clark AT, Plath K: Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:2883-2888.

22.   Liao J, Wu Z, Wang Y, Cheng L, Cui C, Gao Y, Chen T, Rao L, Chen S, Jia N, et al: Enhanced efficiency of generating induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from human somatic cells by a combination of six transcription factors. Cell Res 2008, 18:600-603.

23.   Hanna J, Markoulaki S, Schorderet P, Carey BW, Beard C, Wernig M, Creyghton MP, Steine EJ, Cassady JP, Foreman R, et al: Direct reprogramming of terminally differentiated mature B lymphocytes to pluripotency. Cell 2008, 133:250-264.

 

(Please visit http://im1.biz/FastTrack.htm for update on this table)