|
Top Watch 3(1):22-25, 2008 |
OPEN DISPLAT |
|
http://im1.biz |
|
|
© Truthfinding
Cyberpress |
IPS PUBLICATION |
The
Fast Track for Publishing iPS Research
Shi V. Liu
Eagle Institute of
Molecular Medicine
SVL@logibio.com
(Received 2008-02-25; accepted
HIGHLIGHT
The
speed of publishing research reports on iPS cells has created some world
records that may be hard to beat. But
once the iPS “airplanes” go down people may ask why there was such hurry in
release those flawed “airplanes” into the therapeutic cloning “sky”?
ABSTRACT
Within one and half years,
at least 20 research reports have been published in various “top”
journals. Except for a relatively slow
start, the speed of publishing iPS research reports was extremely fast. Some papers were accepted within just two
weeks of submission and put online in about three weeks. Why would “top” journals rush in publishing
iPS research paper? Did they give these
papers the much needed scrutiny? Why all
these “top” journals would keep a tight suppression on criticisms on their
publications on iPS cells?
KEY WORDS
Stem cell, ES, iPS, Cloning,
Induction, Reprogramming, Regeneration, Hype, Spinning, Fast track, Publish
Since the publication of the first iPS research
paper in 2006 [1], at least 20 research
papers on iPS cells have been published so far (Table 1).
Although
there was a little “hesitance” in publishing the first research report on iPS
cells [1], once the barrier was
broken, the speed of publishing iPS research has become faster and faster,
especially for some selected research groups.
For examples, Yamanaka’s second iPS paper submitted
to Cell was accepted in 13 days and
published in 22 days. A few other iPS
researchers seemed also to have the capability of running the fast tracks in
publishing.
However, coming with this rush was also some
relaxing of scrutiny. As a matter of fact,
these “top” journals even did not care about doing a descent job because some
very obvious mistakes happened in the “high quality” journals [2-4].
More amazingly, the fast publication of iPS research reports was made while
these journals suppressed the publication of some strong criticisms (http://im1.biz/Cloning.htm).
Thus, once the hyping and misrepresentation is
realized by the mainstream, it would be a great shame that those “experts” could
not detect some obvious flaws in the iPS research. It would also be a great irony that the “top”
journals were at the bottom of publishing truth.
Table
1. A chronological list of experimental research reports on iPS cells
|
No |
Reference |
Group |
Received |
Revised |
Accepted |
Publish
online |
Publish in
print |
Accepted |
Published
** |
|
1 |
Takahashi 2006 [1] |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Cell 126:663,
2006 |
< |
~ |
|
2 |
Okita et al 2007 [5] |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Nature 448:313,
2007 |
~ |
~ |
|
3 |
Wernig et al 2007 [6] |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Nature 448:318,
2007 |
< |
~ |
|
4 |
Maherali et al 2007 [7] |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Cell Stem
Cell
1: 50, 2007 |
< |
~ |
|
5 |
Blelloch et al 2007 [8] |
4 |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
Cell Stem
Cell
1: 245, 2007 |
NA |
NA |
|
6 |
Mann et al [9] |
9 |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
Nature Method August 2007 page i |
NA |
NA |
|
7 |
Meissner et al [10] |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Nature Biotechnol. 25:1177,
2007 |
< |
~ |
|
8 |
Qin et al. [11] |
7 |
NR |
NR |
NR |
|
Cell Res. 17:
959,2007 |
NA |
NA |
|
9 |
Yu et al 2007 [12] |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Science 318:1927, 2007 |
35d |
42d |
|
10 |
Hanna et al 2007 [13] |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Science 318: 1920, 2007 |
33d |
42d |
|
11 |
Takahashi et al 2007 [14] |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Cell 131: 861,
2007 |
13d |
22d |
|
12 |
Nakagawa et al 2007 [15] |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Nature
Biotechnol. 26: 101, 2008 |
17d |
24d |
|
13 |
Brambrink et al [16] |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Cell Stem Cell 2:151, 2008 |
< |
< |
|
14 |
Park et al 2007 [17] |
6 |
|
|
|
|
Nature 451: 141, 2008 |
24d |
37d |
|
15 |
Masaki et al [18] |
8 |
|
|
|
|
Stem Cell Res. 1:105,2008 |
33d |
|
|
16 |
Aoi et al [19] |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Science (AOP) |
30 |
37 |
|
17 |
Stadtfeld et al [20] |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Cell Stem Cell 2:1,2008 |
16 |
25 |
|
18 |
Lowry et al [21] |
10 |
|
2007-12-19 |
? |
|
PNAS 105:2883,2008 |
NA |
81 |
|
19 |
Liao et al [22] |
11 |
NR |
NR |
NR |
|
Cell Res 18:600, 2008 |
NA |
NA |
|
20 |
Hanna et al [23] |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Cell 133:250, 2008 |
37 |
56 |
* Group: 1= Yamanaka’s lab;
2=Jaenisch’s lab; 3=Hochedlinger’s lab; 4=Ramalho-Santos’ lab; 5=Thomson’ lab;
6 Daley’s lab,
7 D. Pei’s lab, 8 =Masaki et al; 9 =Mann et al; 10 = Plath’s lab. 11 = G. Pei’s
lab.
**
Publishing speed based on first publication either online or in print.
NR: Not revealed; NA: not
applicable; AOP = Advanced online publication
References
1. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from
mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006, 126:663-676.
2. Liu SV: Towards a balanced view on iPS Cells. Logical Biology 2008, 8:32-38.
3. Liu SV: The final blow-up of the induction and
reprogramming claim for iPS cells. Logical
Biology 2008, In press.
4. Liu SV: iPS cells: a more critical review. Stem Cells Dev Published advanced online doi:
101089/scd20080062 2008.
5. Okita K,
Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S: Generation of
germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2007, 448:313-317.
6. Wernig M,
Meissner A, Foreman R, Brambrink T, Ku M, Hochedlinger K, Bernstein BE,
Jaenisch R: In vitro reprogramming of
fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature 2007, 448:318-324.
7. Maherali
N, Sridharan R, Xie W, Utikal J, Eminli S, Arnold K, Stadtfeld M, Yachechko R,
Tchieu J, Jaenisch R, et al: Directly
reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread
tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 2007,
1:55-70.
8. Blelloch
R, Venere M, Yen J, Ramalho-Santo M: Generation
of induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of drug selection. Cell Stem Cell 2007, 1:245-247.
9. Mann CJ,
Newman ENC, Whitney DJ, Latchem NJ, Bramke I, Burke JF: Stem and iPS cell selection: quantitation of surface marker (SSEA1) and
intracellular GFP. Nature Method 2007,
August:i-ii.
10. Meissner A,
Wernig M, Jaenisch R: Direct
reprogramming of genetically unmodified fibroblasts into pluripotent stem
cells. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:1177-1181.
11. Qin D, Li
W, Zhang J, Pei D: Direct generation of
ES-like cells from unmodified mouse embryonic fibroblasts by
Oct4/Sox2/Myc/Klf4. Cell Res 2007,
17:959-962.
12. Yu J,
Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J,
Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, et al: Induced
pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 2007, 318:1917-1920.
13. Hanna J,
Wernig M, Markoulaki S, Sun C-W, Meissner A, Cassady JP, Beard C, Brambrink T,
Wu L-C, Townes TM, Jaenisch R: Treatment
of sickle cell anemia mouse model with iPS cells generated from autologous
skin. Science 2007, 318:1920-1923.
14. Takahashi
K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by
defined factors. Cell 2007, 131:861-872.
15. Nakagawa M,
Yoyanagi M, Tanabe K, Takahashi K, Ichisaka T, Aoi T, Okita K, Mochiduki Y,
Takizawa N, Yamanaka S: Generation of
induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts.
Nature Biotechnol 2008, 26:101-106.
16. Brambrink
T, Foreman R, Welstead GG, Lengner CJ, Wernig M, Suh H, Jaenisch R: Sequential expression of pluripotency
markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells. Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2:151-159.
17. Park IH,
Zhao R, West JA, Yabuuchi A, Huo H, Ince TA, Lerou PH, Lensch MW, Daley GQ: Reprogramming of human somatic cells to
pluripotency with defined factors. Nature
2007, 451:141-146.
18. Masaki H,
Ishikawa T, Takahashi S, Okumura M, Sakai N, Haga M, Kominami K, Migita H,
McDonald F, Shimada F, Sakurada K: Heterogeneity
of pluripotent marker gene expression in colonies generated in human iPS cell
induction culture. Stem Cell Res 2008,
1:105-115.
19. Aoi T, Yae
K, Nakagawa M, Ichisaka T, Okita K, Takahashi K, Chiba T, Yamanaka S: Generation of pluripotent stem cells from
adult mouse liver and stomach cells. Science
2007, AOP Februay 14, 2008:DOI
10.1126/science.1154884.
20. Stadtfeld
M, Maherali N, Breault D, Hochedlinger K: Defining
molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse.
Cell Stem Cell 2008, 2:1-11.
21. Lowry WE,
Richter L, Yachechko R, Pyle AD, Tchieu J, Sridharan R, Clark AT, Plath K: Generation of human induced pluripotent
stem cells from dermal fibroblasts. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:2883-2888.
22. Liao J, Wu
Z, Wang Y, Cheng L, Cui C, Gao Y, Chen T, Rao L, Chen S, Jia N, et al: Enhanced efficiency of generating induced
pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from human somatic cells by a combination of six
transcription factors. Cell Res 2008,
18:600-603.
23. Hanna J,
Markoulaki S, Schorderet P, Carey BW, Beard C, Wernig M, Creyghton MP, Steine
EJ, Cassady JP, Foreman R, et al: Direct
reprogramming of terminally differentiated mature B lymphocytes to
pluripotency. Cell 2008, 133:250-264.
(Please visit http://im1.biz/FastTrack.htm for update on this table)