Shi V. Liu’s Views on Citation and
Impact Factor
(Selected publications; Updated 2008-10-28)
|
Title |
Reference |
Link* |
|
Glories after Retractions: What Do the Citation Numbers Mean? |
Logical Biol. 5:125-127, 2005 |
|
|
Retracted Papers: How to Curtail Their Impact? |
Logical Biol. 5:128-130, 2005 |
|
|
Citation Bubbles Burst after Name-Poking |
Logical Biol. 5:131-134, 2005 |
|
|
Publishing One Paper Every 3-6 Days for over 10 Years, Who Can Do This?
|
Logical Biol. 5:135-136, 2005 |
|
|
Top-Cited Engineering Researchers, Who Are They Really? |
Logical Biol. 5:137-139, 2005 |
|
|
Correcting False Impact: Actions Speak Louder Than Words |
Logical Biol. 5:217-218, 2005 |
|
|
Winning the Nobel Prize: Does the Citation Number Really Matter? |
Logical Biol. 5:222-225, 2005 |
|
|
Predicting Nobel Prizes: Citation Laureates' Low Chance to Win |
Logical Biol. 5:294-296, 2005 |
|
|
Nobel Prize-Winning Original Publications' Under Performance in Making
Citation Glory |
Logical Biol. 5:297-305, 2005 |
|
|
A Nobel Prize-Winning Work Is Hard to Find in Publication Databases |
Logical Biol. 5:306-307, 2005 |
|
|
Harvesting Nobel Prizes for Citation Laureates: Another Year of No
Yield |
Logical Biol. 6:79-80, 2006 |
|
|
Retracted Papers Are Still Unmarked and Being Cited Continuously |
Sci. Ethics. 1:22-23, 2006 |
|
|
The Impact Factor Scam in Scientific Publishing |
Sci. Ethics 1:72-73, 2006 |
|
|
Censorship, Misconduct, Fraud, Peer review, Publishing pressure, and
Impact Factor |
Sci. Ethics 1:74-76, 2006 |
|
|
Top Journals' Top Retraction Rates |
Sci. Ethics 1:91-93, 2006 |
|
|
Citation Should Credit Pioneering Researchers and Original Works |
Sci. Ethics 1:94-96, 2006 |
|
|
Hwang's Retracted Publication Still Contributes to Science's Impact Factor
|
Sci. Ethics 2:44-45, 2007 |
|
|
Re-invention and distortion in Nature |
Sci. Ethics 2:46-47, 2007 |
|
|
I cannot believe this, you
shameful! |
Sci. Ethics 2:48-50, 2007 |
|
|
Fixing the peer review system |
Sci. Ethics 2:55-56, 2007 |
|
|
This outrageous lie has got to
stop! |
Sci. Ethics 2:79-85, 2007 |
|
|
Stop playing the impact factor
game! |
PLoS Med.3:e291Response |
|
|
Flawed Impact Factor Severely Undervalued the True Impact of Medical
Hypotheses |
Top Watch 2:61-62, 2007 |
|
|
Comment on the Correspondence
by Cokol et al. |
EMBO Rep. 8:792-793, 2007 |
|
|
Denouncing martin Ackermann’s repeated credit robberies |
Sci. Ethics 3:15-18, 2008 |
|
|
An unethical handling of an ethical complaint |
Sci. Ethics 3:19-22, 2008 |
|
|
Logic and Integrity in Scientific Debate on Impact Factor and
Retraction |
Top Watch 2:57-60, 2007 |
|
|
Open
Letter to Nobel Prize Selection Committee against Awarding Yamanaka and other
iPS Cell Researchers |
Top Watch 3: 1-3, 2008 |
|
|
Open the review process for the public’s best interest |
Top Watch 3: 4-5, 2008 |
|
|
The iPS spinning in top journals |
Top Watch 3: 19-21, 2008 |
|
|
The fast track for publishing iPS research |
Top Watch 3: 22-25, 2008 |
|
|
Applaud a noble Nobel Prize |
Top Watch 3: 30-31, 2008 |
|
|
Further clarification required after a Nobel Prize |
Top Watch 3: 32-33, 2008 |
|
|
Eliminating a highly misrepresented impact factor |
Sci. Ethics 3:25-26, 2008 |
* Right-click on the respective link and then select Open hyperlink to open the HTM or the PDF file of the same paper. These publications can be freely re-posted if the original URL for this page is provided. The original URL for this page is http://im1.biz/CitationIF.htm or http://im1.biz/CitationIF.pdf. Providing this original URL in any re-posting is important because the content of this page will be updated and amended.